|
69
Nov 21, 2005 17:45:49 GMT -5
Post by KaiserWilhelm on Nov 21, 2005 17:45:49 GMT -5
Well then, I guess we'd better make it two people. You interested?
|
|
|
69
Nov 21, 2005 21:10:21 GMT -5
Post by ajcap on Nov 21, 2005 21:10:21 GMT -5
I think I'll pass for now
|
|
|
69
Nov 24, 2005 12:43:17 GMT -5
Post by Akula Matata on Nov 24, 2005 12:43:17 GMT -5
err... who will be the other person?
|
|
|
69
Nov 24, 2005 23:49:42 GMT -5
Post by ajcap on Nov 24, 2005 23:49:42 GMT -5
kaiser
|
|
|
69
Nov 25, 2005 7:41:41 GMT -5
Post by Akula Matata on Nov 25, 2005 7:41:41 GMT -5
hmm... is it this late already? sorry, i have to go stand over there now
|
|
|
69
Nov 25, 2005 20:24:49 GMT -5
Post by ajcap on Nov 25, 2005 20:24:49 GMT -5
but kw's already over there and he's doing a handstand. oh, nevermind
|
|
|
69
Nov 28, 2005 0:52:32 GMT -5
Post by KaiserWilhelm on Nov 28, 2005 0:52:32 GMT -5
no, I just proved you can have 69 by yourself if there's someone else involved.
|
|
|
69
Nov 28, 2005 16:17:23 GMT -5
Post by Akula Matata on Nov 28, 2005 16:17:23 GMT -5
dark times are upon us... i say we boycot this practice
|
|
|
69
Nov 28, 2005 17:58:18 GMT -5
Post by ajcap on Nov 28, 2005 17:58:18 GMT -5
which one?
|
|
|
69
Nov 28, 2005 17:58:44 GMT -5
Post by KaiserWilhelm on Nov 28, 2005 17:58:44 GMT -5
69 I would assume
|
|
|
69
Nov 28, 2005 18:08:48 GMT -5
Post by ajcap on Nov 28, 2005 18:08:48 GMT -5
but why?
|
|
|
69
Nov 29, 2005 0:07:44 GMT -5
Post by KaiserWilhelm on Nov 29, 2005 0:07:44 GMT -5
ask akula
|
|
|
69
Nov 29, 2005 10:09:45 GMT -5
Post by Akula Matata on Nov 29, 2005 10:09:45 GMT -5
not 69, but the single person form of it... i say it is a disgrace to such a noble pass-time
|
|
|
69
Nov 29, 2005 15:47:15 GMT -5
Post by ajcap on Nov 29, 2005 15:47:15 GMT -5
how so?
|
|
|
69
Nov 29, 2005 19:56:59 GMT -5
Post by KaiserWilhelm on Nov 29, 2005 19:56:59 GMT -5
aparently ajcap has never experienced 2 person 69. then again, he's right. What's wrong with just one person.
|
|