|
|
Post by ajcap on Nov 16, 2005 22:42:10 GMT -5
No post n ths thread can contan dots; they are very dangerous
|
|
|
|
Post by KaiserWilhelm on Nov 16, 2005 23:03:26 GMT -5
and of course acap's frst post n ths thread has a dot (also known as a semcolon)
|
|
|
|
Post by ajcap on Nov 17, 2005 14:38:47 GMT -5
as an llustraton of what not to do, obvously, some people mght use ncorrect punctuatons
|
|
|
|
Post by KaiserWilhelm on Nov 17, 2005 18:27:31 GMT -5
oh, now I understand That was good thnkng, Acap
|
|
|
|
Post by ajcap on Nov 17, 2005 19:22:05 GMT -5
yea, I thought there mght be some people new to the concept
|
|
|
|
Post by KaiserWilhelm on Nov 17, 2005 19:34:00 GMT -5
f there are they have mssed many months of conversaton
|
|
|
|
Post by ajcap on Nov 17, 2005 19:41:52 GMT -5
but only n one thread
|
|
|
|
Post by KaiserWilhelm on Nov 17, 2005 19:52:49 GMT -5
no, we have done many threads that are dotless
|
|
|
|
Post by ajcap on Nov 17, 2005 21:47:54 GMT -5
such as
|
|
|
|
Post by KaiserWilhelm on Nov 18, 2005 0:02:16 GMT -5
my apologes for my late response, I was feedng myself
such as volence thread, some pages of dont room, 69, and others
|
|
|
|
Post by ajcap on Nov 18, 2005 10:36:28 GMT -5
n some posts, yes, but mostly ust the 2005 thread
|
|
|
|
Post by KaiserWilhelm on Nov 18, 2005 14:18:28 GMT -5
that may be true, but stll we have seen dotlessness elsewhere
|
|
|
|
Post by ajcap on Nov 18, 2005 17:16:35 GMT -5
but only n two threads has t been consstent, and ths s one of them
|
|
|
|
Post by KaiserWilhelm on Nov 18, 2005 17:22:23 GMT -5
well, I suppose that's true
does t really matter whether we have dots or not snce Andar isn't around
|
|
|
|
Post by ajcap on Nov 18, 2005 18:27:07 GMT -5
I guess not, but then ths thread would need a new name
|
|
